METHODOLOGY HUB

About GlitchTech

43 tests across 13 disciplines. One score. Built to cut through the noise.

Read methodology

43

TESTS IN RUBRIC V1.1

13

DISCIPLINES

7

BPR-ELIGIBLE DISCIPLINES

About GlitchTech

GlitchTech is the product review vertical of Glitch Studios. Detailed copy to be written in a future phase.

Methodology

How we score, grade, and compare tech reviews. We compute two scores per device: BPR (editorial quality grade, medal tiers) and GlitchMark (raw aggregate performance score, base 1000).

The BPR Formula

BPR — Battery Performance Ratio — is a single 0–100 score that summarizes how much of a laptop's plugged-in performance it keeps on battery. We compute it as the geometric mean of per-discipline battery/AC ratios across the seven BPR-eligible disciplines.

$ BPR = exp( (1/n) × Σ ln(battery_i / ac_i) ) × 100

Why geomean, not arithmetic mean? A geometric mean treats a 50% drop in one discipline the same weight as a 200% gain in another — a single catastrophic regression can't be hidden by a strong average. It's the right tool when you're combining ratios.

Disciplines

GlitchTech scores 13 disciplines per device. Seven are BPR-eligible — workloads where battery mode materially changes performance. The remaining six are measured AC-only and feed GlitchMark, not BPR.

Medal Thresholds

BPR scores map to four medal tiers. A device earns a medal only when five or more of the seven BPR-eligible disciplines are measured.

PLATINUM

90–100

Near-zero battery penalty.

GOLD

80–89

Minor battery impact — holds most performance unplugged.

SILVER

70–79

Noticeable dropoff on battery — workable but visible.

BRONZE

60–69

Significant battery drop — plan on plugging in for heavy work.

No medal

< 60

Below 60% or fewer than 5 of 7 BPR-eligible disciplines measured.

GlitchMark

GlitchMark is a single number that summarizes a device's performance across every benchmark we record. One score per device. Higher is better; the reference device sits at 100.

Where BPR grades the qualitative value of a review (Platinum / Gold / Silver / Bronze on a 7-of-13 rubric), GlitchMark is the raw aggregate sortable number across the full benchmark set. Both surface side-by-side; they answer different questions.

The GlitchMark numbers shown in rankings are the stored score multiplied by 10 and rounded to the nearest integer — a base-1000 reference scale for human readability.

Formula

For each benchmark a device runs, we compute a normalized ratio against a fixed reference value. Higher-is-better tests use raw / reference; lower-is-better tests use reference / raw. Reference device → ratio 1.0 → score 100.

GlitchMark is the geometric mean of all those ratios, multiplied by 100:

GlitchMark = (r₁ · r₂ · ... · rₙ)^(1/n) × 100

Worked example: a device with 8 measured tests where two tests are 2× and 8× the reference and the rest equal the reference (ratios = [2, 8, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]) yields a geometric mean of 16^(1/8) ≈ 1.41 — GlitchMark ≈ 141.

Test count policy

  • Below 8 measured tests: no GlitchMark — the signal is too thin to publish.
  • 8–11 measured tests: score published with a partial flag (e.g. GlitchMark 142 · partial (10/18 tests)).
  • 12 or more measured tests: score published without a partial flag.

Reference baselines

DisciplineTestDirectionReferenceUnit
cpuGeekbench 6 Multi-Core↑ higher12000.0000score
cpuGeekbench 6 Single-Core↑ higher3100.0000score
gpu3DMark Steel Nomad Light↑ higher4800.0000score
llmllama.cpp tg128↑ higher38.0000tok/s
storageAmorphousDiskMark Seq Read↑ higher5200.0000MB/s
thermalCinebench 10-min loop retention↑ higher88.0000percent
wirelessiperf3 Wi-Fi down↑ higher1450.0000Mbps
battery_lifeVideo loop (local 1080p)↑ higher22.0000hours

Version history

v1initial release. Geometric mean × 100, per-test reference baselines as listed above, ≥8-test floor, partial flag for 8–11.

Exclusion Policy

A discipline may be excluded from a specific review when the hardware lacks the relevant component (no discrete GPU, no neural engine), the test harness isn't supported on that platform, or the reviewer documents a specific opt-out reason. Every exclusion is recorded per-review and shown on the review page.

When fewer than five of the seven BPR-eligible disciplines have complete AC + battery data after exclusions, we render no medal at all. A "Not enough data" placeholder appears in its place. Showing a misleading low-data score would do more harm than showing none.

Rubric Changelog